Forest loss, Tshopo, east of Kisangani (DRC): 408.45 ha in 90 d
Tshopo, east of Kisangani (DRC) · seen
33185 GFW integrated deforestation alerts (≥ high confidence) covering 408.45 ha between 2026-06-28 and 2026-09-26; AOI alert density is 1.89× its 25 km neighbourhood. Awaiting optical confirmation.
What we saw
- Area: 408 hectares — about 570 football fields
- Global Forest Watch alerts — 33185 alerts (≥ high confidence), 408.45 ha, 2026-06-28…2026-09-26. (Sep 26, 2026) See the source ↗
What it might not be
- Coverage is 30°N–30°S only — zero alerts outside the tropics means 'not monitored', not 'no loss'.
- Cannot distinguish legal clearing, fire, storm damage and selective logging from illegal clearing; attribution needs concession/protected-area layers (M3).
- Alerts lag reality by ~1–2 weeks; a burst just before the sweep is undercounted.
- Regrowth and plantation harvest cycles look like loss; the baseline ring only partly compensates.
- Persistent cloud can delay optical confirmation for months (SAR-only RADD alerts stay 'candidate').
What would change our mind
Newer satellite images that show no change, a correction from the data source, or a reply with evidence from the ground. If that happens, the case is marked “Turned out wrong” — in public — and it stays on this site.
Why this is not published
Not published yet: only one source has seen this so far. We wait for a second, separate one before anything goes up.
Right of reply
If a case names or affects you, you can reply. A reply channel that keeps both sides on record is being set up; until then, every case page carries its ledger id so a reply can be attached to it.
Ledger id 01a0deea-a10c-7c5a-95d8-eb3c2945162c
Technical details rule, evidence ids, history, proof
- Rule
- forest_loss v1.0
- Tier
- T1
- Tags
- congo-basin, drc, smallholder-frontier
- Confirmed
- Not yet — single signal
- Rule FP rate
- 50 % · 2 of 4 decided
- Location
- 0.55°N 25.65°E
- Observed
- 2026-09-26
- Opened
- 2026-09-26 by automatic rule forest_loss v1.0
- candidate
- confirmed
- published
- resolved
Evidence1
33185 alerts (≥ high confidence), 408.45 ha, 2026-06-28…2026-09-26.
Context
- AOI
- 1633.8
- Ring
- 864.391
- Metric
- alert ha per deg²
Publication gates
- Evidence — 1 piece from gfw-integrated-alerts — met
- Independent confirmation — not yet — not met
- Human approval — 0 of 1 needed at tier 1 — not met
Publication is decided by the ledger’s rules, not by the AI: the event that publishes a finding is refused unless every gate above is met.
History1
- created → candidateautomatic rule forest_loss v1.0
Verify
Checked in your browser just now, against the files this site serves:
- Checkpoint signed by the published ledger key (Ed25519)
- This case’s latest event is in the log’s hash tile
- Its audit path rebuilds the signed Merkle root
- Checkpoint
- earthdeck.dev/findings/v1 · 23 entries
- Signed root
98f501ea7b18…03d8f3- This case
- 1 signed event
- Leaf
- #6 of 23 — this case’s latest event
- Leaf hash
78a42a4389bd…7f5270- Proof
5-hash audit path
- 96975c2f515210325267b400855b432fca828e40cbbe55b36e39b52b50712d16
- 67d8ef003ca7f7c48c7b264b89981eb8cff0056112dcbfc1798c4159c8525009
- 6b10ad870347dc96d85c0d5bd2a41e9c927b32ab49197f7747a632045d200011
- 6598d797221b073b60d46aa844eae21088bc5544c00da73ede7396316fc56a5f
- 4a353bd4228873504ddacce3976e700a8f44051505c8db4cdd55e1d387e08c25
- Last event
01715fda7fa9…ccafde- Note
Checkpoint text
earthdeck.dev/findings/v1 23 mPUB6nsYl6cXwueotNRJ80TfqTTMx5TVtGhn118D2PM= — earthdeck TkCXv+gZUFrKQuTIDCzT//Iq9xayLZfvnv5RpOdRIxrlavfIeuQLP1bP0LmnSltfP2nqDAADjxr7nksOwDgNrIZCXwc=
Re-derive every entry, signature and trust rule yourself:
npx -y earthdeck ledger verify --remote https://vitalearth.io